Almost every beginner is familiar with the concept of placing a stoploss in trading. However there is a huge difference between placing stoploss and placing it correctly. After an entry is taken quite often a trader places a stoploss randomly some points away. Although there is a slight opposite move in market normal fluctuation, Stoploss gets hit and price starts moving in the same direction again.
But after a situation like this, traders can tend to blame the markets. However, the problem is sometimes not related to the markets, but with the stop-loss placement.
The lesson that Meri learns is that one should not decide the stop-loss based entirely on the amount of loss. The more important question is where the trade setup invalid.
In case that Agar is taking entry based on trader support, fresh stop-loss can be set based on market structure. For eg. to take fresh stop-loss can be based on resistance based setup in invalidation level.
That does not mean any one stop-loss formula will work for all strategies. Different strategies and timeframes require different stops.
Lekin ek rule ke taur par ek common hai: stop-loss lagana chahiye jahan trade idea sach much galat proved ho.
Same with position sizing, trying to understand the stop-loss too. If the stop-loss is relatively far away from the logical entry, it does not mean the trader should avoid the trade. Position size can be increased in order to keep the risk within the predefined risk limit.
For instance, ek trader ek setup mein ₹1,000 se zyada risk nahi lena chah hai. Agar setup ka logical stop-loss bahut wide hai, to it would be prudent to keep the position size small. Conversely, with a narrow stop-loss, large positions can also prove dangerous.
The stop-loss distance and position size are related.
Sometimes the beginners decide the position size first and subsequently impose the stop-loss according to that. In this case, the market structure may be neglected.
Optimizing the process would have been better: identify the setup first, then find the invalidation level and then calculate the position size.
Now here’s an important point: Keeping a stop-loss very close to the entry is not always safer. The market can experience normal fluctuations. The stop if not loose enough can cause the position to exit even if the trade idea is correct.
Another mistake is to move stop-loss inside the trade. When the price is near to stop-loss, trader is feeling, “give it a little more room”. And stop-loss is moved few points away. If in the end market moves against trend again, trader repeats the same decision once again.
Aise in that loss that was under control at one point can gradually become much much larger.
My lesson is that the stop-loss should not be moved under emotional duress. If the strategy contains a predetermined rule for trailing stops or dynamic adjustment, that‘s a different matter. But shifting stop-losses just to accept loss is not risk management.
Losses can never be eliminated entirely in a trading. The aim should be that whenever a wrong trade is taken it does not blow away the account.
Isliye trade enter karne se pehle yeh decide karna useful hai:
When the trade idea would become invalid?
What is the maximum acceptable risk kitna hai?
What is the logical location of stop-loss?
What is the risk vaise of position?
Kya stop-loss kuch samay baad jazbaat ki jagah move hoga?
If answers of questions in agar are pre-informed thendecision-making outside trade tendscould be easier.
Moreover, plan for reward should also be in place alongwith stop-loss. Just having thought of “I will not lose more than ₹500” may be an incomplete approach. Trader should also be clear what must be realistic profit opportunity in setup.
Ek setup ke liye logical stop-loss, ₹500 ke potential risk ke saath, kya realistic upside ke roop me sirf ₹300 bana raha hai, jabki paas ke resistance ke karan. Is tarah ke setup ke liye proceed karne se pehle structure ke bare me sawal karna samajhitargat ho sakta hai.
Here the risk-reward useful framework can be provided.
Whereas, following the fixed ratio blindly is not necessary. Every market and every strategy has different structure. It is the most important to appraise the potential reward with real market levels.
Meri practically approach hoti: pe gde setup, phir invalidation, phir risk, and then reward.
Can this sequence help this trader to avoid ignoring risk in the excitement of entry.
Achi chart bhi bad trade ho sakte hain agar stop-loss nahi hai ya target illogical hai to.
The quality of trade are not always decided from Entry point.
The entry, stop-loss, position size and exit plan are parts of a complete system.
My most significant learning about the concept of stop-loss is not to think of it as the enemy of loss. In reality stop-loss gives the trader a framework to operate in the uncertainty of the market.
No setup is perfect. A strong trend can reverse, a breakout can fail and a pattern that is technically appealing can also not give expected result. So it is important to accept that there is always a chance that one will be proved wrong before taking a trade.
You can not control the market but you can control your maximum risk.
This time keep a trade plan, don‘t focus only on entry level. First of all find out when a trade idea will become invalid. Then determine a stop-loss, adjust stop position size based on rule and evaluate the possible reward at realistic level.
Agar is not good structure so it‘s completely valid to skip trade.
Smart trading does not mean to trade every opportunity.
Kabhi best decision entry lena hota hai, kabhi best decision chart ko dekh kar “not worth the risk” kehte hai.
Long term consistency is never from a single perfect trade.
Comments
Post a Comment