Market har din same behave nahi karta. Kabhie price smoothly move karta hai, Kabhie price narrow range mein stay karta hai, aur kabhi kabhi news ke karan ya kuch bhi unexpected volatility ke kaarana candles ekstremly fast ho jaate hain . But trading rules ko har baar market ke behave ke saath change karna ek new problem create kar sakta hai.
Lesson I have learnt is, that is basically two different things to adapt market scenarios and to keep switching trading rules. The strategy should be flexible but without losing discipline.
Suppose maan lijiye aap normally merge breakout setup karte hain. In trending markets the breakouts may be smooth and clean. In sideways markets you may fail time and again in the breakout setup. The trader needs to understand that market environment has changed and modification in rules of the strategy cannot be the solution after each failed trade.
Trading plan should be ideally define before hand,: in which market condition setup is valid, when to avoid trade and risk can be managed.
Market badal sakte hai, trader ki process without reason nahi badalna chahiye.
Yahi differnce ek important distinction banata hai impulsive aur consistent decisions ke beech.
Most common mistake comes when the trader after one or two losses starts to doubt his rules. If hit stop-loss, rule is changed. If target is missed, exit rule is changed. If two trades are profitable, risk suddenly jumps up. These decisions might be driven more by emotions rather than data.
To evaluate one trading rule or a single trading transaction is not enough, the sample size counts. If a method has a trading journal or a testing history, then it might be more valuable to compare the different conditions of the market
For instance, if you are trading trending market its behaviour will be different, while for range bound market it can give totally different outcomes. So trader should not only look at profit-loss rather setup frequency, average loss, average win, draw down and market condition are also very important to observe.
Meri have learned that if you want to change a rule, the reason should be make sense. Has the market structure actually changed? Are the assumptions of the strategy no longer relevant? Or is it just that after so many hits people are frustrated?
World‘s worst trader never ever make temporary frustration a permanent trading rule.
It is necessary to change the agar.
Market adaption does NOT mean that everyday you use a new strategy. It means that every disciplined trader will have predefined responses for each market condition.
For example, in trending market trader can prefer trend following setup whereas in sideways market observe range boundaries rather of breakouts. But in both these situations basic risk-management rules can be same.
This is an important distinction: you can have an effective strategy but you do not need to be too flexible with your risk discipline.
As trader usually risk a fixed percentage, doubling risk after only 2 profitable trades makes not a natural adaptation. Likewise, farening stop-loss after a losing streak is not an adaptation to market, it maybe an attempt to avoid losses.
It is also useful to divide trading rules into three categories in meri seekh.
First: regels die niet te onderhandelen zijn, zoals maximum risk.
Second: Market-condition rules may be updated as per trend, the range or volatility.
Thirdly: experimental ideas, jinhe live capital se pehle test kiya chahiye.
With this in mind the trader could gain a very good sense of what is ok to change and what is just an emotional outburst.
Trading journal can become a very important tool in this process. Instead of just penning down “profit” or “loss” the trader should be recording what was the context of the trade. Was the market in trend or in range? Was the volatility normal or extraordinarily high? What was the exact entry set up? Did one stick to the exit plan or did the mind interfere?
After several weeks or months of backtesting, patterns may emerge. The strategy might perform well during trending markets, but poorly during sideways ones. Or the issue might have more to do with execution than the strategy.
Applying the difference rule successfully requires a thorough understanding to be known before one begins.
Sometimes trader blames strategy for actual problem of late entries. Sometimes they blame stop-loss because of illogically large position size and sometimes they blame market for not following trading plan.
The lesson that Meri has learned is “every loss should be a lesson, but not every loss should lead to a change in the rule”.
You could have a straightforward section in your journal asking: “Which rule failed or was not implemented?” It might be very helpful to clarify what exactly went wrong.
Market is changing constantly so knowing about flexibility is important in trading. But it doesn‘t mean that trader rewrites his rules after every new candle pattern, loss or profitable streak.
Meri is simple: watch the market, document your results, and adapt based on the evidence. When conditions change adapt within a pre-defined plan. If a real weakness in the strategy is identified over and over again, test it and perfect it.
Most critical part in risk management is, no matter the market is trending, sideways or highly volatile, the fundamental principle of capital protection should not be ignored. You setup may fail, your prediction can prove wrong and the move may not happen as you expected. So you should have space in your plan to accommodate uncertainties.
Next time market behaviour change ho, khud se ek question poochho: “Kya mujhe adapt karna hai strategy, or I am just changing the rule because of recent result?”
There are different types of reasons.
Consistency in trading doesn‘t mean same profit every day. It means your decisions are originating from a clear, tested and disciplined process in different market situations.
Comments
Post a Comment